WELFARE PENTAGON AND HEXAGON DIALOGUE IN PRACTICE

The Welfare does not get from a simplistic diarchy of Market + State to which the households can look. Many times, they can look towards other sets of diarchies: Families + Markets, or Families + State, or even: Families + Communities, or Communities + Markets: https://www.slideshare.net/rfsalazarc/what-about-the-welfare-pentagon-in-practice In this presentation (see link above), there are 15 dyarchies to which the households+families can look towards for creating welfare: 01. State+Market 02. State+Community 03. State+NGOs 04. State+Academia 05. State+Internationals 06. Market+Community 07. Market+NGOs 08. Market+Academia 09. Market+Internationals 10. Community+NGOs 11. Community+Academia 12. Community+Internationals 13. NGOs+Academia 14. NGOs+Internationals 15. Academia+Internationals 00. is Households+Families The 15 options are {00+01; 00+02; 00+03; ... 00+15} Research by Hexagon Group has shown that the table of convergence is optimal when you get not a dyarchy of welfare but a convergence process where 00 is resembled by a tripartite agreement such as: State+Market+Community Then: 00 ~ 01+02+06 If capitalist welfare comes from households and family/businesses that are productive in a society where politicians get benevolent democratic authorities in the state by following the social rules of communities, and competitive, and economic development comes from adding 05+09+12. The dynamic hexagonal equilibrium of an economy for maximizing welfare is normally obtained when: 00 = [01+02+06] + [05+09+12] Hexagon Group has developed technology for producing route maps towards active social protection like the one here: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=4358&langId=en Roberto F. Salazar-Córdova https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertosalazarhexagon/