The Welfare does not get from a simplistic diarchy of Market + State to which the households can look. Many times, they can look towards other sets of diarchies: Families + Markets, or Families + State, or even: Families + Communities, or Communities + Markets:
In this presentation (see link above), there are 15 dyarchies to which the households+families can look towards for creating welfare:
01. State+Market
02. State+Community
03. State+NGOs
04. State+Academia
05. State+Internationals
06. Market+Community
07. Market+NGOs
08. Market+Academia
09. Market+Internationals
10. Community+NGOs
11. Community+Academia
12. Community+Internationals
13. NGOs+Academia
14. NGOs+Internationals
15. Academia+Internationals
00. is Households+Families
The 15 options are {00+01; 00+02; 00+03; ... 00+15}
Research by Hexagon Group has shown that the table of convergence is optimal when you get not a dyarchy of welfare but a convergence process where 00 is resembled by a tripartite agreement such as: State+Market+Community
Then:
00 ~ 01+02+06
If capitalist welfare comes from households and family/businesses that are productive in a society where politicians get benevolent democratic authorities in the state by following the social rules of communities, and competitive, and economic development comes from adding 05+09+12.
The dynamic hexagonal equilibrium of an economy for maximizing welfare is normally obtained when:
00 = [01+02+06] + [05+09+12]
Hexagon Group has developed technology for producing route maps towards active social protection like the one here:
Roberto F. Salazar-Córdova
Komentarai